FAITH OR ANXIETY
Mt 6:22-34
[= Luke11:34, 3 5, 16:13, 12:22-31]
It is not, at first sight, very obvious how the next four paragraphs
hang together or follow on from the previous part of the teaching on the
mountain: first there is a short saying about the sound eye, and
the eye which is not sound; then another about the impossibility
of serving two masters; after that, a much longer paragraph on anxiety;
and a final short saying on anxiety about tomorrow. The line of thought
may be as follows: the word translated sound ( haplous)
can mean 'single' or 'simple', and it can also mean 'generous'. The disciple
is to be generous in his gifts to God (piety 6:1-21) and he is
to have a single-minded devotion to him (unlike the hypocrites,
who pretend to give to God, but in fact collect their reward from men).
Double-mindedness is impossible in practice like being the slave
of two masters. The disciple must be the slave of God alone, and have
no care for anything except his will; and if he does this, he need not
be afraid for himself because the God whom he is serving is the God who
cares for his creation. He can be trusted today and tomorrow.
There is no very obvious verbal echo of the Beatitudes here. We should
expect to find some reference to the blessings on the poor in spirit
and the meek, and to the promises of the kingdom of heaven
and the earth (5:3, 5). The connexion may lie in the subject-matter:
the man who lives by faith in God, and is not anxious about his life,
will be poor. But God will reward him in the age to come, and will feed
him and clothe him here and now.
The parallels to these verses in Matthew are spread out in three different
chapters of Luke: Lk 6:22-23 = Lk 11:34, 35; Lk 6:24 = Lk 16:13; 6-34
Lk 6:25-34 = Lk 12:22-31.
22f
We have already been reminded that the lamp gives light to all in the
house (5:15); similarly, the eye gives light (in sight) to the whole
body: whether you are a seeing man or a blind man depends entirely
on your eyes. In what sense is Matthew using this parable? sound is
haplous, which as we have seen means both single and generous;
not sound is poneros, and 'the evil eye' means 'grudging',
'mean', 'stingy' (see 20:15, Where R.S.V. translates 'Is your eye evil
... ?' as do you begrudge?)
If the disciple is generous towards God, he will be full of light
( perfect, as his heavenly Father is perfect 5:48). If he is
mean, he will be full of darkness (like the devil). The next saying
expounds the other sense of haplous - single or simple. The disciple
must keep his eye on one master, not on two.
24
The man with the eye which is not sound is attempting the impossible
to serve two masters; the man with the sound eye has
chosen God. Mammon is an Aramaic word, meaning 'wealth', 'property'.
Devotion to God cannot be combined with devotion to mammon, because,
as we have seen already, there will be occasions when the former will
demand the sacrifice of the latter (5:29, 30, 40). A choice is therefore
necessary between God and mammon; or between faith and anxiety (see following
verses).
25
The disciple who is told not to serve mammon may well reply, But
I must have enough to live and to clothe myself. To this, Jesus replies
that God who has made life and the body will certainly look
after those things which are less than these viz. food and
clothing.
26
Moreover, he feeds the birds: how much more will he feed men.
27
And anxiety cannot increase a man's span of life (or stature
[margin], helikia can mean both). Cf 5:36 for our inability
to control the colour of our hair. These things are in the hands of God.
28-30
The same type of argument as that in v. 26 above is used with regard to
anxiety about clothing. God clothes the lilies, even better
than man can clothe himself; the lilies are of less value than
man: therefore God will take care of man's clothing. To think otherwise
is to be men of little faith (oligopistoi, a rare word,
which Matthew uses four times: here and at 8:26, 14:31, 16:8; the only
other occurrence of it in the New Testament is in Luke 12: 28, the parallel
to this passage: did Luke take it from here?).
31
repeats v.25 in order to round off the passage an example of Matthew's
use of inclusio.
32
The Gentiles (who live without faith in God, cf 5:47) are anxious about
these things. The disciples, on the other hand, are to trust God as the
Father who knows all their needs before they ask (cf 6:8).
The prayer which Jesus had taught them did not include petitions for
clothing, and even the petition for food may have been a petition
for the kingdom. That is what the disciples are to pray for, and to trust
God to give them all these things as well.
34
The final futility is to be anxious about tomorrow: tomorrow
is completely outside our possible control today (cf 5:36, 6:27).
There is a possible set of verbal links common to vv. 33, 34, and vv.
10, 11 in the Lord's Prayer: kingdom, righteousness, tomorrow, this
day; kingdom, [God's] will, this day, tomorrow.
|